- ^ The 5 sandwich-particular fillers was: crossbreed arrangement nouns with a possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s next-door neighbor,” in which komsija is also result in Meters or F contract), like in (15b); crossbreed arrangement nouns that have a great possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my personal laugher,” in which cerekalo normally end up in M otherwise Letter arrangement), like in (15c); NSg animate nouns that have an ordinal matter [prvo prase “(the) basic pig,” where prase keeps a crossbreed plural form, creating FSg otherwise NPl agreement], such as (15d); normal contract nouns having a beneficial MSg nominal fit [uspeh dekana “(the) profits (of your) dean,” the spot where the genitive match are homonymous on the paucal, and the paucal allows paucal and MPl arrangement], such as (15e); typical agreement MSg nouns with a great PP complement (prijatelj iz skole “the pal of college or university,” in which appeal consequences will be asked), such as (15f).
- ^ The salience of the instances was regulated on the following way. Earliest, kissbrides.com urgent link you to definitely blogger formulated the brand new instances centered on the girl instinct, as well as the almost every other evaluated them; where conflict emerged, examples had been replaced additionally the processes try frequent into the freshly brought examples.
- ^ The significance of the difference between contract models in position are orthogonal for the hypotheses about desire of papers, as they simply make predictions regarding cousin amount within requirements, or between the conditions together with foot-range percentages. I statement this type of evaluation for the sake of completeness of your statement, while the advised of the publishers of your own frequency.
- ^ I’ve designed and you can administered another type of test like this, therefore we are presently taking a look at the data.
Sources
Arsenijevic, B., and you can Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effect of animacy and you will agentivity towards the control out of arrangement inside Serbo-Croatian,” when you look at the Degree for the Languages and you may Mind, Selected documents regarding third Novi Unfortunate Working area into Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you can Logical Linguistic Browse, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Unfortunate: Faculty of Viewpoints), 41–77.
Arsenijevic, B., and you will Mitic, We. (2016b). With the inside the reliance from intercourse with respect to amount inside agreement that have matched up sufferers: a fresh analysis. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 41–69.
Ba). Morphology, contract and working memory recovery within the sentence production: evidence of intercourse and you may instance in the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.
Hairdresser, H., and Carreiras, Yards. (2005). Grammatical gender and you may matter contract from inside the Spanish: An ERP assessment. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.
Bhatt, R., and Walkow, M. (2013). Discovering arrangement when you look at the sentence structure: a quarrel from contract into the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Idea 31, 951–1013.
Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.
Lme4: Linear Blended-Consequences Patterns Having fun with S4 Groups
Carminati, M. (2005). Control reactions of the function ladder (individual > matter > gender) and you can ramifications to have linguistic theory. Lingua 115, 259–285.
Chomsky, Letter. (2001). “Derivation because of the Phase,” inside Ken Hale. A lives into the Words, ed. M. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Push), 1–52.
Citko, B. (2004). “Arrangement asymmetries within the complement formations,” from inside the Official Solutions to Slavic linguistics: This new Ottawa Meeting 2003, eds An effective. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you may D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications), 91–108.
De- Vincenzi, Meters. (1999). Differences between brand new morphology out of sex and you can matter: evidence out-of creating coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. twenty-eight, 537–553.
De Vincenzi, M., and you will Di Domenico, Age. (1999). A distinction among ?-features: the fresh new character regarding sex and number throughout the retrieval off pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.
Doron, E. (2000). “VSO and you can kept-conjunct contract : biblical Hebrew compared to. modern Hebrew,” on the Sentence structure of your Verb Initial Dialects, eds Good. Carnie and you will E. Guilfoyle (New york, NY: Oxford School Force), 75–96.